UK suckler herds can save up to £100 per cow

Focusing on reducing unnecessary fixed costs could save some lowland and Less Favoured Area suckler herds £100 per cow, said Eblex

A rural farming scene
A rural farming scene

Focusing on reducing unnecessary fixed costs could save some Less Favoured Area (LFA) and lowland suckler herds £100 per cow, according to Eblex’s first Stocktake Report.

The detailed benchmarking figures collected by Eblex show average lowland herds spend £107 more than the top third on fixed costs, whereas LFA herds spend £129 more. About £30 per cow of the difference in spend relates to rent costs for both herd types, according to Carol Davis, senior analyst at AHDB/Eblex.

“Rent is a big driver for profit and a significant percentage of overall fixed costs,” she said.

“It’s important to optimise use of the land you have in terms of grassland management, stocking levels and inputs, such as fertiliser and lime.

“We also see the top third herds having labour costs which are £24 and £43 per cow lower than average herds, for lowland and LFA enterprises respectively. While labour is a complex issue and smaller herd sizes appear to have an impact, it is worth considering what is spent on labour and whether there are ways to reduce it, perhaps by combining stock tasks.”

She added that there were also differences in machinery, contracting and fuel prices, but it was best to consider these together. For instance, some farms could be keeping hold of machinery, which is expensive to maintain and run, as well as using contractors.

Extra data on physical performance which has been collected by Eblex highlights two areas for improvement: first calving age and pence per kilogram (p/kg) sale values.

Top third herds have a policy of calving more heifers at a younger age and fewer calve at two and a half years and over.

“Calving earlier reduces costs in many areas and means cows will have more calves in their lifetime, as long as they are selected and managed correctly as heifers. The lower herd replacement rate and replacement cost for top third herds supports this,” Mrs Davis said.

“There is also a difference in sale prices on a p/kg basis between average and top herds, with top herds appearing to sell better quality animals or market them better. This is likely to be a case of ensuring breeding bulls are selected on their genetic potential and that animals are bred to meet their ultimate market’s specification.”

In addition, she said that neither lowland suckler herds nor LFA herds were achieving the Eblex target of 95 calves weaned for every 100 cows put to the bull.

“There is potential for most herds to improve their suckler output,” she added. “Benchmarking your own herd against the Stocktake figures can help identify target areas for improvement.”

Net margin figures included in Stocktake data do not include income from Single Farm Payments, Environmental Stewardship Payments or diversification, which remains a vital part of whole farm income. But it does include family labour, rent or a rental value and interest on working capital.

Journalists

David Whetstone
Culture Editor
Graeme Whitfield
Business Editor
Mark Douglas
Newcastle United Editor
Stuart Rayner
Sports Writer