Andrew Miller: Emerging markets: Slower but are they surer?

Most people live in emerging markets, so in an increasingly integrated world, it makes sense to think that most market capitalisation eventually will too

Andrew Miller
Andrew Miller

Most people live in emerging markets, so in an increasingly integrated world, it makes sense to think that most market capitalisation eventually will too.

Unfortunately, this argument applies only on a very long-term view (and is no guarantee of good investment returns even then). China, for example, has grown 7% faster than the US per annum since 1996, yet its stock market has underperformed the S&P500 by an average 5% per annum.

The emerging world as a whole has grown 3% per annum faster than the developed world over the same period, and has contributed most to global growth (a mostly home-made, not export-driven, contribution).

But that contribution has not done it much good: its roller-coaster relative stock market performance has left it where it started. (CHK)

Slower growth in China, and attendant worries about internal debt and its shadow-banking sector, have unsettled many.

China is a big country, and its numbers can be scary if presented out of context – which many instant experts are only too happy to do.

Its empty new towns look alarming, its investment is hugely inefficient, and its pollution is daunting (London’s recent smog literally pales into insignificance by comparison with the norm in Beijing – or even Hong Kong).

Our view remains however that the slowdown underway is manageable; we think China’s consolidated balance sheet is sound; we recognise that it is both able and willing to act decisively if needed.

China has been a poor investment to date, largely because corporate earnings have not grown anywhere near as quickly as its GDP might have suggested.

But if its government succeeds in making market forces play a more “decisive” role – by not, for example, interfering in the setting of prices, or the direction of fixed investment and bank lending – then China’s structural slowdown could coincide with better stock market performance.

There may be less prospective GDP growth ahead, but if more of it makes its way to the corporate bottom line it could be more valuable to investors.

And China, like emerging markets generally, has been looking relatively inexpensive.

Tactically, we have been sitting on the fence, waiting for more developed-world monetary normalisation to be priced-in before turning more positive.

But markets may not be so patient.

Andrew Miller is a director of Barclays Wealth and Investment Management in Newcastle

 
comments powered by Disqus

Journalists

David Whetstone
Culture Editor
Graeme Whitfield
Business Editor
Mark Douglas
Newcastle United Editor
Stuart Rayner
Sports Writer